The veteran is not entitled to a temporary total evaluation for convalescence following the November 2004 left eye surgery.
The deciding factor: There is no competent evidence of medical restriction in regard to working following the November 2004 left eye surgery, and the records indicate that the veteran's eye was doing well upon follow-up examination.
- Claimed conditions
- left eye surgery
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 16, 2009
- Citation
- 0901915
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 952 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0901915.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of left eye surgery at a VA Medical Center has been dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Partly granted
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and remanded the issues regarding sleep apnea, left inguinal hernia, sinus or respiratory disability, cervical spine disorder, numbness in the left hand/fingers, and left eye surgery. The right inguinal hernia with scar issue is also being remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for VA medical treatment without payment is being remanded due to the need to adjudicate her service connection claims and other pending claims related to her disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran seeks compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for injuries he alleges resulted from VA ophthalmologic treatment in 1997. The claim is being remanded due to the need for an examination and additional records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.