The Board denied the application to reopen a claim for service connection for the residuals of an eye injury, as new and material evidence was not received.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not show any current residual disability from the chemical burn of the veteran's eyes during service, thus it is not so significant that it needs to be considered with the other evidence on the merits.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of an eye injury
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 27, 2009
- Citation
- 0902838
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,642 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0902838.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a dental disability and residuals of an eye injury are remanded due to inadequate VA examination opinions. The Board will provide the Veteran with another opportunity for VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims of service connection for residuals of an eye injury and glaucoma due to additional development being necessary.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases of service connection for residuals of an eye injury and glaucoma due to incomplete information from a VA examiner's CV, and additional private treatment records need to be obtained.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection and TDIU due to insufficient evidence or need for further examination. The Veteran's eye, head injury, and seizure disorder cases require additional medical opinions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.