The appeal is remanded to the RO for additional development, including obtaining medical records and possibly scheduling an examination with a VA psychiatrist.
The deciding factor: Further development is required as the previous remand instructions were not fully complied with, specifically regarding contact with treating physicians who may have opinions linking the veteran's esophageal condition to his service-connected PTSD.
- Claimed conditions
- esophageal achalasia
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 30, 2009
- Citation
- 0903443
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,419 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0903443.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board denied service connection for IBS and esophageal achalasia but remanded decisions on Crohn's disease, constant urination, hypertension, bruxism, degenerative disc disease, low back condition, and neck condition.
- Whole decision: Denied
The VA treatment in August 2005 did not result in any additional disability, and the Veteran's current conditions are considered to be due to his pre-existing condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran is seeking compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for esophageal achalasia, which she claims was caused by improper and/or negligent VA treatment in October 1989 and May 1992. The Board has remanded the case to obtain relevant VA clinical documentation.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the claim for service connection for esophageal achalasia, finding that it was not incurred or aggravated by service and is not related to a service-connected condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.