The claim for service connection for multiple sclerosis was remanded for additional development, including an examination to determine the date of onset and etiology of the condition.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence does not provide a clear opinion on the onset or relationship to service of the veteran's multiple sclerosis, necessitating further development.
- Claimed conditions
- Multiple sclerosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 30, 2009
- Citation
- 0903456
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for multiple sclerosis to correct a duty to assist error in obtaining relevant private treatment records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection of the Veteran's cause of death to correct a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for further development and examination, as well as readjudication.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the case to obtain J.M.'s federal records from SSA, as VA has not made any efforts to secure and consider these records.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.