The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date was denied, as the evidence did not establish clear and unmistakable error in a prior rating decision or that new and material evidence had been submitted to reopen his claim for heart problems.
The deciding factor: The April 1989 rating decision denying service connection for hearing loss and dizziness was found to be correct and not subject to CUE, and the evidence did not support reopening the claim for a heart disorder.
- Claimed conditions
- Meniere's disease (intermittent vertigo with aural fullness), Heart problems
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 17, 2009
- Citation
- 0905624
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the appeal to obtain additional evidence, including VA treatment records and information regarding potential Agent Orange exposure.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD due to an inadequate medical opinion.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.