Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board denied service connection for frostbite of the legs, frostbite of the left hand, degenerative joint disease of the hands (claimed as arthritis secondary to frostbite), back disorder, right carpal tunnel syndrome (claimed as arms condition secondary to frostbite), diffuse calcification, peripheral vascular disease, of the left radial and ulnar arteries (claimed as arms condition and circulatory problems secondary to frostbite), peripheral vascular disease of the legs (claimed as circulatory problems secondary to frostbite), and calcaneal spurs, degenerative joint disease, of the feet (claimed as secondary to frostbite).

The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's claims lacked credibility due to his vague recollection of a cold injury at an indeterminate point during service and his failure to report or seek treatment for such injuries. The examiner's opinions were deemed not probative due to the presence of other factors that could also account for the Veteran's symptoms.

Claimed conditions
frostbite of the legs, frostbite of the left hand, degenerative joint disease of the hands (claimed as arthritis secondary to frostbite), back disorder, right carpal tunnel syndrome (claimed as arms condition secondary to frostbite), diffuse calcification, peripheral vascular disease, of the left radial and ulnar arteries (claimed as arms condition and circulatory problems secondary to frostbite), peripheral vascular disease of the legs (claimed as circulatory problems secondary to frostbite), calcaneal spurs, degenerative joint disease, of the feet (claimed as secondary to frostbite)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 4, 2009
Citation
0907861

Veterans Law Judge

S. S. TOTH

Decisions by this judge: 251 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0907861.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.