Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board remanded the claim for higher rating to the RO, and after completing the requested development, the AMC granted an increased 40 percent rating for duodenal ulcers.

The deciding factor: The decision was based on the evidence of record and the applicable legal criteria.

Claimed conditions
duodenal ulcers, status post laparotomy
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
40%
Decision date
March 5, 2009
Citation
0908252

Veterans Law Judge

JACQUELINE E. MONROE

Decisions by this judge: 2,196 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0908252.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.