The case was remanded to obtain additional evidence regarding the Veteran's service aboard the U.S.S. Mahan and to provide appropriate VCAA notice.
The deciding factor: Further development is necessary to comply with the VCAA duty to assist requirements and to obtain relevant records.
- Claimed conditions
- Cause of death
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 10, 2009
- Citation
- 0908855
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for further development to determine if the Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents during his service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection of the Veteran's cause of death to correct a pre-decisional duty to assist error, specifically regarding an examination to determine if the Veteran's cause of death was related to his service-connected PTSD and conceded exposure to herbicide agents.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board is remanding the case to obtain an opinion on whether the Veteran's cause of death was due to in-service Agent Orange exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the matter for a VA medical opinion to determine if the Veteran's service-connected conditions contributed to his death.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.