The Board finds that entitlement to service connection for impotence as secondary to the Veteran's service connected PTSD is warranted, and that the criteria for entitlement to special monthly compensation for loss of use of a creative organ have been met.
The deciding factor: The evidence both for and against finding that the Veteran's medications resulted in his impotence are in relative equipoise, and this equates to loss of use of the creative organ.
- Claimed conditions
- Impotence
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 11, 2009
- Citation
- 0908983
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,642 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0908983.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the erectile and prostate disorder, particularly in relation to service-connected conditions like heart disability and diabetes.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's appeal for restoration of the 100% rating for prostate cancer was denied. A 40% rating for residuals of prostate cancer from May 1, 2018 is granted. The Veteran is also granted TDIU effective May 1, 2018.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied a compensable rating for impotence associated with residuals of a radical prostatectomy, finding that the Veteran did not have deformity of the penis and was already receiving compensation for erectile dysfunction.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service connection for degenerative arthritis of the thoracolumbar spine is granted. The Board finds that remanding the issues of service connection for sleep apnea, hypertension, and impotence is necessary as the representative has recently advanced that these disorders may be secondary to obesity caused by the service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.