The veteran's claim for automobile and adaptive equipment or adaptive equipment only was remanded for further development, as the evidence is unclear regarding the extent of his foot impairment and its relation to his service-connected degenerative disc disease in his lower back.
The deciding factor: Further medical examination is needed to determine if the veteran has loss or permanent loss of use of one or both feet, and whether such loss is related to his service-connected condition.
- Claimed conditions
- Degenerative disc disease in his lower back, Foot drop
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 13, 2009
- Citation
- 0909528
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,020 · Granted: 19% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0909528.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's nerve injury with foot drop resulting from a right total hip replacement performed at a VA facility in April 2015 is not service-connected under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to lack of evidence showing carelessness, negligence, or similar instance of fault on the part of VA.
- Denied
The Board denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a left leg and/or foot disorder, including foot drop and swelling, caused by VA treatment during the Veteran's March 2012 total knee replacement surgery.
- Denied
The Veteran's right foot disorder, including nerve damage and foot drop, is not considered to be caused by VA treatment. Therefore, compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a right foot disorder is denied.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's current right ankle disability with foot drop was not incurred in or aggravated during service and denied his claim for service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.