The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development and a determination on whether exposure to ionizing radiation in service caused or contributed to the Veteran's acute myelogenous leukemia.
The deciding factor: There is insufficient evidence of record to determine if the Veteran was exposed to ionizing radiation, and thus a referral to the Under Secretary for Benefits is necessary.
- Claimed conditions
- acute myelogenous leukemia
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 16, 2009
- Citation
- 0909649
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 3,217 · Granted: 46% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0909649.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the appellant's request for an earlier effective date for service connection for the cause of her husband's death, finding that the claim must be denied as there is no legal basis to assign an earlier effective date.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death due to cardiac arrest and acute myelogenous leukemia, finding no indication that these conditions were related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of an etiology opinion regarding the Veteran's acute myelogenous leukemia, which was presumed to be caused by exposure to Agent Orange during service. The AOJ is instructed to seek an opinion from a medical specialist on whether it is more likely than not that the condition occurred in or is related to the Veteran's military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient information regarding the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents and UV radiation, as well as a need for further medical opinion on whether his causes of death are related to these exposures.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.