The Board remands the case for additional development, including a VA examination to determine the current nature and likely etiology of any kidney problems.
The deciding factor: Further evidence was submitted after the last RO consideration, necessitating a new examination to clarify the Veteran's condition and its relation to service.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic renal failure
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 16, 2009
- Citation
- 0909743
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,084 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0909743.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for prostate cancer and chronic renal failure, finding that there was no evidence linking these conditions to the Veteran's military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's cause of death, including pneumonia and COPD, is being remanded to determine if it was due to exposure to jet fuel during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the February 2022 decision denying eligibility to enroll in the PCAFC is not consistent with applicable law and requires remand for development based on a precedent case. The Veteran's eligibility should be evaluated under the correct statutory criteria.
- Denied
The Veteran's death was not caused by any service-connected disability, and the Board found insufficient evidence to establish a connection between his conditions and his military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.