The case is being remanded to the RO for additional development and consideration in accordance with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA) and Court directives.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on the need to provide the appellant with a VCAA notice letter that complies with Hupp v. Nicholson and Dingess/Hartman, as well as further development of the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 18, 2009
- Citation
- 0909989
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.