The Veteran's claims for service connection for macrocytosis and hypercholesterolemia were denied as there is no current diagnosis of a disability related to these conditions.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence that the laboratory findings of macrocytosis or hypercholesterolemia resulted in any impairment of industrial capacity, and therefore service connection cannot be granted for these conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- macrocytosis, hypercholesterolemia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 19, 2009
- Citation
- 0910233
Veterans Law Judge
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0910233.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's appeal for service connection for various conditions including hypoglycemia, sinusitis, left foot pes planus, right foot pes planus, right foot plantar fasciitis, left ankle pain, left hip osteoarthritis, left knee sprain, bradycardia, dry eye, hernia, hypercholesterolemia, and bilateral hearing loss.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and pneumonia due to insufficient evidence in the record. The Veteran's current diagnoses are not supported by the medical records provided.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for hypercholesterolemia has been dismissed as the appellant requested to withdraw his appeal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's application for PCAFC eligibility was denied due to the Centralized Eligibility and Appeals Team (CEAT) finding that he does not meet current eligibility requirements. The CEAT determined the Veteran is not in need of personal care services on a continuous basis, citing his medical records as noting various health concerns but not rising to the level of needing personal care services for ADLs or supervision.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.