The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a bilateral eye disorder, a prostate disorder, and a schizoaffective disorder as there was no evidence of a current disability for VA purposes or an etiological link to active service. The claim to reopen for residuals of a lumbar laminectomy was also denied due to lack of new and material evidence.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran did not have a current eye disorder, his prostate enlargement and schizoaffective disorder were not related to his military service, and he failed to present new and material evidence to reopen his claim for residuals of a lumbar laminectomy.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a lumbar laminectomy, bilateral eye disorder, prostate disorder, schizoaffective disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 24, 2009
- Citation
- 0910926
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, diagnosed alternatively as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder, due to an inadequate VA examiner's opinion and a failure to fulfill the duty to assist in obtaining relevant medical records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the service connection claims for various conditions due to a lack of compliance with previous remand directives and inadequate medical opinions.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including MDD and PTSD, as well as initial compensable ratings for right ear hearing loss and tinnitus. The claims for service connection for erectile dysfunction, a bilateral eye disorder, asthma, and a skin disorder were remanded.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for a bilateral eye disorder, to include as due to radiation exposure, finding that the evidence did not support an etiological relationship between the Veteran's service and his diagnosed conditions.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.