The appeal is remanded for additional evidentiary development, including a search for medical records related to the Veteran's education benefits and VA medical records.
The deciding factor: Further evidence is needed due to the loss of service medical records and the need to reconstruct the Veteran's health status during his period of eligibility for VA educational assistance.
- Claimed conditions
- myelodysplasia
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 27, 2009
- Citation
- 0911448
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,456 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0911448.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, particularly his bilateral foot disabilities, precluded him from obtaining and maintaining substantially gainful employment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of a VA medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's cause of death was related to his service, including exposure to non-ionizing radiation from work as a radio relay equipment repairman and as a Troposcatter equipment repairman.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim for TDIU due to insufficient evidence showing that the Veteran is unemployable by reason of his service-connected disabilities. The case must be referred to the Director of Compensation Services for consideration under 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(b).
- Remanded (sent back)
The claim of service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death has been reopened, but the Board finds that there is insufficient evidence to establish a direct or presumptive link between the Veteran's myelodysplasia and his military service. The issue of service connection for myelodysplasia remains remanded as well.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.