Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Board has reopened the claim for hepatitis C, finding that new and material evidence has been submitted. However, it is unlikely that service connection can be established due to a lack of direct evidence linking the condition to service or any in-service risk factors.

The deciding factor: The medical opinions indicate that while air gun injections theoretically could have caused hepatitis C, there is no actual evidence supporting this and other risk factors are more likely causes.

Claimed conditions
hepatitis C
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 7, 2009
Citation
0912897

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0912897.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.