The Veteran's dizziness is related to his service-connected hearing loss and tinnitus, and the Board finds that it was incurred as a result of his service.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner opined that the Veteran's intermittent dizzy spells were more likely than not related to vestibular dysfunction and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, which is characterized by recurrent episodes of ear fullness, hearing loss, tinnitus, and vertigo. The examiner also noted that the inner ear includes the vestibular apparatus.
- Claimed conditions
- dizzy spells
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 11, 2009
- Citation
- 0917647
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0917647.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for dizzy spells and hypertension due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error. The Veteran is seeking service connection for these conditions, which he contends are related to his active military service, including exposure to ionizing radiation during service at Walker Air Force Base.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's dizziness is associated with his diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. The Board denied service connection for dizzy spells.,There is no current diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy in the Veteran's medical records. The Board denied service connection for diabetic neuropathy.,The Veteran failed to report for a necessary examination without good cause. The Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder (other than PTSD).,The evidence does not establish that the Veteran has a current diagnosis of PTSD. The Board denied service connection for PTSD.,There is no current diagnosis of vision in the Veteran's medical records. The Board denied service connection for vision.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted a 10 percent evaluation for benign growth of the bones (benign mass to frontal bone) prior to April 7, 2020, but denied an evaluation in excess of 10 percent from that date. The Board also remanded the claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board dismissed the claim for anxiety attack and denied claims for bilateral hearing loss, blunt force trauma to mouth, and cauda equina lesion. All other issues were remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.