The Veteran is seeking a higher rating for his service-connected right tibia and fibula fracture, which currently results in a 10 percent evaluation. The claim is being remanded to consider additional disabilities such as decreased calf size, mild intermittent paresthesia, hyperpigmentation, and chronic tenderness.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's disability involves multiple associated symptoms that were not fully addressed by the previous examination.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of a right tibia and fibula fracture, decreased calf size, mild intermittent paresthesia to the upper pretibial region, hyperpigmentation, chronic, intermittent tenderness
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 13, 2009
- Citation
- 0918002
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0918002.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Veteran's dry eye syndrome is granted service connection due to an in-service injury. Several other claims for service connection are remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to errors in obtaining necessary evidence and opinions related to the Veteran's skin condition, including vitiligo, dry skin, and hyperpigmentation.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's acne with hyperpigmentation prior to February 25, 2013 affected less than 5 percent of his total body area and exposed areas, requiring only topical therapy. Therefore, he is not entitled to a compensable evaluation.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's skin disorder, diagnosed as hyperpigmentation, is found to be related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus and thus granted service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.