The Board has ordered additional development of the Veteran's claims due to a failure to obtain in-service medical records from Walter Reed Army Hospital and Ireland Community Army Hospital. The case is being remanded for further review.
The deciding factor: VA failed to request all relevant in-service medical records, including those from Walter Reed Army Hospital and Ireland Community Army Hospital, which could have provided important information about the Veteran's psychiatric condition during his service.
- Claimed conditions
- undifferentiated schizophrenia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 11, 2009
- Citation
- 0922046
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0922046.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to errors in decision-making and failure to consider all relevant evidence, including the Veteran's service records and a private psychological evaluation. The case is now pending for further review.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete service records and the need for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorders, including PTSD.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient compliance with previous remand directives, requiring a new VA opinion on the nature and etiology of the Appellant's undifferentiated schizophrenia.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate VA medical opinions regarding the service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder. The examiner is requested to provide a new opinion considering the Appellant's lay contentions and the diagnosis of schizophrenia in March 1975, within one year of his discharge from service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.