Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has ordered the case to be remanded due to inadequate development of medical opinions regarding the etiology of the veteran's right eye glaucoma and nuclear cataracts.

The deciding factor: The VA examination did not address the etiology of the veteran's nuclear cataracts, which is required by the July 2008 Board remand.

Claimed conditions
right eye glaucoma, nuclear cataracts
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
June 19, 2009
Citation
0923274

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0923274.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.