The Board denied the appellant's claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for the cause of her husband's death, finding that there was no written application or claim received prior to November 18, 2005.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the fact that the appellant did not file a formal or informal claim for benefits as a surviving spouse before November 18, 2005. The Board found that there was no legal basis for an earlier effective date due to the lack of a valid application.
- Claimed conditions
- Cause of Death
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 23, 2009
- Citation
- 0923564
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0923564.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for cause of death and diabetes mellitus, type I to ensure complete service records are associated with the claims folder and to obtain necessary medical opinions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for AML and cause of death due to insufficient medical opinion regarding potential Agent Orange exposure. The AOJ will consider any new evidence submitted after the April 2024 decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case for a new supplemental statement of the case (SSOC) due to additional evidence received after the most recent SSOC. The appellant is seeking an earlier effective date for service connection for cause of death.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to uncertainty about the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents, specifically in Guam. Additional development is needed to determine if the USS Enterprise was within 12 nautical miles of Guam or its territorial waters during the Veteran's service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.