The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for cervical and lumbar spine disabilities, prostate cancer, a chronic sleep disorder, and an acquired psychiatric disability.,All issues were found to be without merit.
The deciding factor: The evidence submitted by the appellant did not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating his claims for service connection. The Board upheld the previous denial as there was no new or material evidence presented that could support reopening any of the previously denied claims.
- Claimed conditions
- Prostate cancer and its residuals, Cervical segment of the spine, Lumbar segment of the spine
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 26, 2009
- Citation
- 0924265
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0924265.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board finds that the Veteran's death was caused by, or substantially or materially contributed to, a disability incurred in or aggravated by active service. The evidence is in relative equipoise as to whether the cause of the Veteran's death (end-stage renal disease and end-stage COPD) is related to active service.,The Board finds that prostate cancer and its residuals were incurred in active service as due to in-service ionizing radiation exposure. The evidence is in relative equipoise as to whether the Veteran's in-service asbestos exposure caused his COPD.
- Partly granted
The claim for service connection for prostate cancer and its residuals was reopened based on new evidence, but ultimately denied as the competent evidence did not demonstrate a link to active duty.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for a TDIU due to his service-connected cervical spine disability, finding that the RO properly assigned the effective date of October 26, 1998.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.