The Board found that the Veteran's pre-existing left eye vision loss did not worsen during service and is a result of natural progression. Therefore, service connection for this condition was denied.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence showed that the Veteran had pre-existing left eye vision loss due to trauma as a child, which has since progressed naturally over time without any increase in severity during service.
- Claimed conditions
- Left Eye Vision Loss
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 1, 2009
- Citation
- 0924738
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0924738.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's left eye vision loss is not considered to be due to VA laser surgery, and the Board finds that there is no additional disability resulting from this procedure.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's left eye vision loss is not deemed to be the result of VA care, and it was a foreseeable event.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current left eye vision loss is not due to the August 2003 VA surgical procedures, including a keratoplasty and trabeculectomy. The surgery did result in some improvement of his vision but ultimately worsened over time.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's TDIU claim was granted effective May 7, 2010. The Board previously denied the claim prior to this date.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.