The Veteran's claims for increased disability ratings for his service-connected lung and spine disabilities are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations.
The deciding factor: Additional medical examination is required to determine the current level of disability and whether any neurologic symptoms are related to diabetes mellitus or degenerative disc disease.
- Claimed conditions
- lobectomy of the right lower lung due to granuloma, degenerative disc disease for the lumbosacral spine at L5-S1, degenerative disc disease of the thoracic spine
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 17, 2009
- Citation
- 0926758
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0926758.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the AOJ's decision denying eligibility for the Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) is not supported by adequate reasoning and must be remanded to allow for a thorough review, including obtaining medical opinions on whether it is in the best interest of the Veteran to participate in the PCAFC program.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the Veteran's claims for increased disability evaluations and TDIU due to missing records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the Veteran's claims for increased disability evaluations to the AOJ for additional development due to a need for clarification regarding earned income since July 2017 and constructive possession of highly relevant treatment records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development and readjudication, including consideration of new evidence submitted by the Veteran. The issues include a claim for an increased rating for back disability and a TDIU claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.