The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is denied as the preponderance of the competent medical evidence does not support a finding that his current condition resulted from VA treatment in July 1982.
The deciding factor: The January 2009 VA examination and opinion found no evidence of paralysis or any residual effects from Zomax, which is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication.
- Claimed conditions
- paralysis of the lower extremities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 17, 2009
- Citation
- 0926832
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0926832.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's vascular disease was not caused by VA treatment, but his other conditions (neurogenic bowel/bladder, spinal cord disorder, erectile dysfunction, paralysis of the lower extremities, and sacral ulcers) were reasonably foreseeable complications of his September 2005 VA treatment. The Board finds these additional disabilities warrant compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran's paralysis of the lower extremities did not originate in service or due to carbon tetrachloride exposure, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's claim for service connection for paralysis of the lower extremities, including as due to carbon tetrachloride exposure, is being remanded for additional development and consideration.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.