The Veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than September 4, 2003 for a 30 percent evaluation for scars of the left leg is denied as there is no evidence suggesting that his disability had increased in severity prior to this date.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence showing that the Veteran's left leg scars warranted a 30 percent evaluation in the year prior to September 4, 2003, and the effective date for the award of a 30 percent evaluation must be controlled by the date of receipt of the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- scars of the left leg
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- August 3, 2009
- Citation
- 0928858
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0928858.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the claims for earlier effective dates and service connection, as the evidence did not support the Veteran's assertions.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for an increased rating for his service-connected scars of the left leg and thigh, finding that they did not meet the criteria for a compensable disability rating. The claim for service connection for peripheral vascular disease was also denied as there is no evidence linking it to his service-connected shell fragment wounds.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.