The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining Social Security Administration records and scheduling a VA neurological examination to assess the current level of impairment due to her service-connected brain syndrome.
The deciding factor: The decision was not explicitly decided on service connection but rather on rating assignment. The need for further evidence and an appropriate medical opinion led to remand.
- Claimed conditions
- brain syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 10, 2009
- Citation
- 0929785
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0929785.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for cause of death to obtain an addendum medical opinion addressing whether the Veteran's service-connected cannabis use disorder was a contributing cause of death.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran does not have any residuals of brain syndrome, and therefore the criteria for a compensable rating are not met.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of medical services provided by Halifax Hospital on April 14, 2006 was denied because the services were not a medical emergency and prior authorization was not obtained.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's medical expenses at St. Francis Heart Hospital were reimbursed as the VA facilities were not feasibly available and the emergency situation had not resolved prior to his discharge.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.