The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings were denied. The Board found no evidence of chronic sinusitis, and the Veteran's left forearm shrapnel wound residuals did not meet criteria for a higher rating prior to June 27, 2008 or from that date forward. The right buttock cyst removal scar and left foot wart removal scars were not shown to be disabling enough to warrant compensable ratings. The lumbosacral spine disability was found to not warrant an increased rating.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings were denied as there was no evidence of chronic sinusitis, the left forearm shrapnel wound residuals did not meet criteria for a higher rating prior to June 27, 2008 or from that date forward. The right buttock cyst removal scar and left foot wart removal scars were not shown to be disabling enough to warrant compensable ratings. The lumbosacral spine disability was found to not warrant an increased rating.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic sinusitis, shrapnel wound to the left forearm, residuals of right buttock cyst removal, residuals of left foot warts removal, lumbosacral spine disability, residuals of shell fragment wound (SFW) of the left leg
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 20, 2009
- Citation
- 0931260
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0931260.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for a disability rating in excess of 20 percent for his lumbosacral spine disability and for TDIU based on that condition due to inadequate examination. The case is being returned for further development.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied service connection for chronic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis, and chronic fatigue syndrome as there is no evidence of a current disability in the record.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a lumbosacral spine disability, finding that there is no evidence to support a link between the condition and active duty service or any other factor.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for chronic sinusitis and remanded the claim for a lumbar spine disability due to insufficient evidence.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.