The Veteran's claim for service connection for peripheral neuropathy, bilateral upper and lower extremities as a result of exposure to Agent Orange is being remanded due to the need for additional development including a VA examination.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence is needed to determine if the Veteran's current peripheral neuropathy may be related to his military service, including exposure to Agent Orange during his service in Vietnam.
- Claimed conditions
- Peripheral neuropathy, bilateral upper and lower extremities
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 24, 2009
- Citation
- 0931601
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0931601.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to a need for a VA examination regarding the Veteran's peripheral neuropathy.
- Granted
The Board has granted an effective date of October 13, 2004 for the service connection of major depressive disorder with associated irritability and tension as secondary to thoracolumbar disc and joint disease. The effective date for left lower extremity radiculopathy is set at August 20, 2010.
- Granted
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has granted service connection for PTSD and Mood Disorders, both presumed conditions under the PACT Act.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.