The Board finds that the Veteran does not meet the criteria for entitlement to monetary assistance for the purchase of an automobile and adaptive equipment or adaptive equipment only due to insufficient evidence of permanent impairment of vision in both eyes.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence is conflicting regarding the level of the Veteran's visual acuity, with some findings suggesting he has better vision than required for the benefit sought.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral uveitis with bilateral glaucoma, cataract, right eye, detachment of the retina and status post cataract removal with light perception only, left eye
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 24, 2009
- Citation
- 0931686
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0931686.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for asthma, cataracts, congestive heart failure, low back pain, and bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy due to a duty to assist error related to lost or destroyed service treatment records.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeals because the appellant died during the pendency of the appeal and thus has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's petition to reopen his previously denied claims for sinus condition, hypertension, bilateral hallux valgus, bilateral eye disorder (including dry eyes), bilateral cataracts, sleep apnea, lumbar spine disability, recurrent subluxation of left knee, post-operative left knee with DJD, right knee DJD, and right knee instability are remanded.,The Veteran's petition to reopen his previously denied claim for service connection for left renal arteriovenous malformation (AVM), burn scars of the bilateral ankles, tender left knee scar, and linear left knee scar is also remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development of the record, including scheduling an eye examination and considering all submitted evidence. The veteran's claim will be reconsidered based on this new information.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.