The Board has determined that the appellant's uterine disability, prior to May 20, 2008, warranted a 30 percent evaluation. Beginning on May 20, 2008, when she underwent a supracervical hysterectomy, her disability was rated at 100 percent. From August 20, 2008, the date of surgery, until now, she is entitled to a 30 percent evaluation.
The deciding factor: The appellant's recent surgical removal of her uterus resulted in a permanent loss of use of a creative organ, warranting a 100% evaluation under Diagnostic Code 7628.
- Claimed conditions
- uterine disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- August 31, 2009
- Citation
- 0932696
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0932696.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has dismissed the appeals for service connection for chronic allergies, a respiratory disability, and a uterine disability. The remaining issues have been remanded due to new evidence being added to the record.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.