The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination to assess the current status of his right ear and eustachian tubes.
The deciding factor: The Court found that the Board did not ensure an adequate medical examination in compliance with its August 2005 remand order.
- Claimed conditions
- right otitis media, bilateral eustachian tube dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 3, 2009
- Citation
- 0933202
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0933202.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral eustachian tube dysfunction and an increased rating of 10 percent for allergic rhinitis. The claim for chronic sinusitis is remanded due to inadequate VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of bilateral eustachian tube dysfunction and denied his claim for service connection. The issue of entitlement to service connection for deviated nasal septum is remanded due to inadequate medical examination.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's disability manifested by near syncopal episodes, diagnosed as bilateral eustachian tube dysfunction, is granted. The Board found that the condition was incurred in service and resolved reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to service-connected disabilities, finding insufficient evidence to substantiate a reasonable possibility that his service-connected conditions render him unable to secure and maintain substantially gainful employment.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.