The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unable to tend to the basic functions of self-care without regular assistance from another person and vulnerable to the hazards and dangers incident to his environment, meeting the criteria for special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner determined that the Veteran was in need of daily skilled services due to his service-connected disabilities, including limitations in mobility and self-care abilities.
- Claimed conditions
- {"conditionName":"hiatal hernia with reflux","rating":30}, {"conditionName":"status post dislocation of the right (major) shoulder","rating":30}, {"conditionName":"post operative neuroma of the right foot with arthralgia of the second, third and fourth metatarsal phalangeal joints","rating":30}, {"conditionName":"degenerative joint disease of the right knee","rating":20}, {"conditionName":"residuals of an injury to the right knee","rating":10}, {"conditionName":"lateral subluxation of the left knee","rating":10}, {"conditionName":"degenerative joint disease of the left knee with limited flexion","rating":10}, {"conditionName":"residuals of a right elbow fracture with ulnar neuropathy","rating":10}, {"conditionName":"limitation of flexion of the right knee associated with residuals of an injury","rating":10}, {"conditionName":"limitation of extension of the right knee associated with residuals of an injury","rating":10}
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 80%
- Decision date
- September 16, 2009
- Citation
- 0934673
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0934673.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.