Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran does not have diabetes mellitus or a current skin disorder that can be presumed to have developed due to herbicide exposure. The Board denies service connection for these conditions.

The deciding factor: There is no evidence of chloracne, other acneform disease consistent with chloracne, or porphyria cutanea tarda in the Veteran's medical records, and his current skin disorder was not diagnosed until after service.

Claimed conditions
Diabetes Mellitus, Skin Disorder (Atopic Dermatitis)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 9, 2009
Citation
0938655

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0938655.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.