The Veteran's claim for prostatitis and earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus were both denied as there is no current diagnosis of prostatitis, and the criteria for an earlier effective date are not met.
The deciding factor: There was no current diagnosis of prostatitis in the medical records. The effective date cannot be earlier than May 8, 2001 due to lack of a claim prior to that date or retroactive application of the liberalizing law.
- Claimed conditions
- prostatitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 9, 2009
- Citation
- 0938694
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0938694.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The appeal seeking to establish entitlement to a TDIU prior to July 30, 2019 and basic eligibility for DEA under 38 USC chapter 35 is dismissed as the pending Legacy system appeal fully encompasses and exceeds the scope of this AMA version of the issues.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's claim of service connection for hyperlipidemia. Service connection is granted for cervical strain, prostatitis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), including as secondary to PTSD.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for prostate cancer and prostatitis due to potential exposure at Fort Dix and Schofield Barracks. The AOJ must consider these contentions and provide proper notice and assistance.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's prostatitis is related to his toxic exposures during active duty service, and the Board has granted service connection for this condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.