Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Veteran's claim for a higher disability rating and TDIU was granted, but the attorney is not eligible for payment of fees as it pertains to issues that were not decided by an appellate decision.

The deciding factor: The Board incorrectly applied the law in In re Mason, holding that both the increased evaluation and TDIU rating must be the result of an appellate decision.

Claimed conditions
osteoarthritis of the cervical spine
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
60%
Decision date
October 15, 2009
Citation
0939122

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0939122.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.