The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining a VA medical opinion regarding the Veteran's right upper extremity disability and considering whether separate ratings are warranted. The appellant's accrued benefit claims will also be reconsidered.
The deciding factor: The Court ordered the Board to consider whether separate ratings are possible for any right arm disability related to the service-connected cervical spine disability, as well as to determine if TDIU is warranted.
- Claimed conditions
- herniated nucleus pulposus of the cervical spine, right upper extremity disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 12, 2009
- Citation
- 0943101
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0943101.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew the appeals for service connection for a psychiatric disorder, to include generalized anxiety and depression; obstructive sleep apnea; left upper extremity disability; and right upper extremity disability.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for left upper extremity, right upper extremity, and low back disabilities was dismissed due to failure to respond to requests for clarification regarding the preferred docket.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a right upper extremity disability to correct a duty to assist error, as the AOJ did not address all claims reasonably raised by the record and did not obtain an adequate medical opinion.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a right upper extremity disability secondary to a service-connected left radial nerve disability due to an inadequate medical opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.