The Board denied the Veteran's request to reopen his claim for service connection due to lack of new and material evidence.
The deciding factor: No new and material evidence was presented that would support reopening the claim for service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- organic affective syndrome, borderline intellectual functioning, mixed personality disorder with schizoid and passive aggressive features
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 3, 2009
- Citation
- 0946000
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0946000.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected dysthymic disorder, anxiety disorder, borderline intellectual functioning, and dyslexia have prevented him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an acquired psychiatric disability, including PTSD and depression, is denied as he does not meet the diagnostic criteria for a diagnosis of PTSD or any other acquired psychiatric disorder.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD, memory problems, mood disorders, psychosis, antisocial personality disorder, and borderline intellectual functioning, has been reopened due to the submission of new evidence. However, service connection is not granted as there is no credible supporting evidence that any in-service stressor occurred or was related to his service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder is related to service. The VA needs to conduct further examination and review of records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.