The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to a need for clarification of the nature and etiology of his neurological symptoms, as well as further examination to determine if there are any residual conditions related to his left wrist injury.
The deciding factor: The Veteran has raised concerns about potential neurological impairment in his upper extremity that may be related to his service-connected left wrist disability. Further evaluation is needed to clarify these issues and determine the appropriate rating for his condition.
- Claimed conditions
- left wrist injury, status post fracture and open reduction internal fixation, residual scar
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 3, 2009
- Citation
- 0946002
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0946002.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew her appeal, and the Board dismissed all issues related to reduction in disability rating for hypothyroidism, compensable rating for residual scar, and discontinuation of SMC.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for neurostimulator removal with residual scar should be remanded due to a duty to assist error.
- Granted
The Veteran's recurrent epigastric hernia and associated residual scar are granted increased disability ratings of 20 percent each, effective from October 23, 2012.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for brachial cyst cancer and a residual scar due to brachial cyst cancer, both related to herbicide exposure during service. The decision is based on the presumption of exposure to Agent Orange.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.