The Veteran's loss of part of his intestine and chronic kidney failure do not constitute loss of use of a creative organ, and the preponderance of the evidence demonstrates no loss of use of a creative organ as a result of his military service. Therefore, the criteria for special monthly compensation based on loss of use of a creative organ have not been met.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's loss of part of his intestine and chronic kidney failure do not meet the criteria for entitlement to special monthly compensation for loss of use of a creative organ as defined in VA regulations.
- Claimed conditions
- Chronic kidney failure, Loss of part of intestine
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 10, 2009
- Citation
- 0946942
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0946942.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for Amyloid Light-chain Amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) and chronic kidney failure as secondary to AL amyloidosis, both related to exposure to contaminants in the water supply at Camp Lejeune.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the effective date for the award of special monthly pension (SMP) for aid and attendance should be July 19, 2007.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, schizophrenia (previously evaluated as a personality disorder), bilateral tinnitus, low back disability, left ankle disability, chronic kidney failure, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, Type II, finding no evidence of in-service incurrence or aggravation and no medical nexus to service.
- Denied
The veteran's claim for reimbursement or payment of unauthorized medical services rendered after the first two days of his private hospitalization in St. John's Medical Center from December 10 to 22, 2003, and during his stay in the RCU of St. John's Medical Center from December 22 to 26, 2003, was denied as he was sufficiently stabilized for transfer to a VA facility.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.