Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran is seeking service connection for PTSD and jungle rot of the feet and ankles. He also claims entitlement to service connection for dioxin poisoning and chloracne due to Agent Orange exposure.,The Veteran seeks a compensable rating for his asthma and residuals of a right ring finger injury.,Service connection for jungle rot, dioxin poisoning, and chloracne is granted as the conditions are presumed based on service in Vietnam. Service connection for PTSD is conceded based on military service and reported stressors.,The Veteran's asthma and right ring finger injuries are evaluated without a specific rating assigned.

The deciding factor: The Veteran has provided sufficient evidence to establish his claims of service connection, including through the use of presumptive exposure to Agent Orange for jungle rot, dioxin poisoning, and chloracne. Service connection is granted based on these conditions.,The Veteran's asthma and right ring finger injuries are evaluated without a specific rating assigned as no additional information was provided or required by the Board in this remand.,Service connection for PTSD is conceded based on military service and reported stressors, jungle rot of the feet and ankles is granted due to presumed exposure to Agent Orange, dioxin poisoning and chloracne are granted due to presumed exposure to Agent Orange, and asthma and right ring finger injuries are evaluated without a specific rating assigned.

Claimed conditions
posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), jungle rot of the feet and ankles, dioxin poisoning, chloracne
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 7, 2010
Citation
1000936

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1000936.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.