The Board found that the evidence received since the March 1992 rating decision does not relate to the unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim of service connection for right knee patellar femoral pain syndrome, and thus is not material. As a result, the claim may not be reopened.
The deciding factor: The additional evidence received since the March 1992 rating decision does not relate to the unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claim of service connection for right knee patellar femoral pain syndrome (i.e., whether it pre-existed service or increased in severity therein).
- Claimed conditions
- right knee patellar femoral pain syndrome
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 5, 2010
- Citation
- 1005332
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1005332.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for TDIU as he was able to secure and maintain substantially gainful employment, even though his service-connected disabilities caused him some functional impairment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for increased ratings of his bilateral knee disabilities and the claim for TDIU due to lack of VA examinations. The cases are now pending with the appropriate examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claim for a higher rating for right knee patellar femoral pain syndrome due to deficiencies in the July 2019 VA examination report. The Veteran is required to provide additional evidence and undergo another VA examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for higher ratings on appeal due to a lack of recent medical evidence and because further examinations are needed to assess the current severity of his right knee disability and headaches.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.