The March 1964 rating decision assigned a 30 percent disability evaluation for the appellant's service-connected conditions, including intracranial hemorrhage, neurological residuals, and loss of part of the skull. The decision is denied as there was no clear and unmistakable error.
The deciding factor: There was no evidence of a separate psychiatric disorder that would have warranted a separate rating in 1964.
- Claimed conditions
- intracranial hemorrhage, neurological residuals, loss of part of the skull
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- March 3, 2010
- Citation
- 1007980
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1007980.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran has a current disability of the sinuses, loss of part of the skull, and an acquired psychiatric disorder that are secondary to his service-connected small cell carcinoma of the ethmoid sinuses and nasal cavity with headaches.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to new evidence received after a previous Supplemental Statement of the Case. The issues include the cause of death, intracranial hemorrhage, acquired psychiatric disorder (likely PTSD), diabetes mellitus, low back disorder, hypertension, and eye disorder.
- Granted
The Veteran's cause of death, intracranial hemorrhage with metastatic colon cancer as a contributing cause, is found to be service-connected.,Dependency and Indemnity Compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1318 is denied due to the Veteran not meeting the criteria for total disability ratings.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for stroke residuals and entitlement to a TDIU due to conflicting evidence regarding whether the Veteran's hypertension, presumed due to herbicide exposure, caused his stroke. The AOJ is instructed to investigate this issue further.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.