The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete service treatment records and the need for a VA examination.
The deciding factor: Incomplete medical records and the need for further evaluation of cervical polyps and related conditions necessitate additional development.
- Claimed conditions
- cervical polyps, von Willebrand's disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 12, 2010
- Citation
- 1009386
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1009386.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied a request for an earlier effective date for the right knee scar and granted separate ratings for left knee extension limitation, instability, flexion limitation, and service connection for endometriosis, cervical polyps, pelvic pain, respiratory disability, low back disability, right hip disability, left hip disability, and anemia.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for additional development due to uncertainty about whether the Veteran's current cervical cancer is related to her in-service cervix complaints.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for cervical polyps, to include chronic residuals thereof, finding no current disability manifested by these conditions.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were performed due to her congenital von Willebrand's disease, which was not service-connected. The Board has now granted service connection for the postoperative residuals of a total hysterectomy based on aggravation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.