The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected adjustment reaction with anxiety and depression due to insufficient evidence regarding the effects of his service-connected condition on his overall psychiatric impairment, including whether it is possible to distinguish the symptoms and effects of his service-connected disability from any nonservice-connected conditions.
The deciding factor: Further examination by a psychiatrist or psychologist is needed to determine the extent of the Veteran's adjustment reaction with anxiety and depression and its impact on his overall psychiatric condition.
- Claimed conditions
- adjustment reaction with anxiety and depression
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 9, 2010
- Citation
- 1013506
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1013506.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected psychiatric disabilities have resulted in occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity, warranting a 70 percent rating since August 24, 2010.
- Denied
The Veteran's adjustment reaction with anxiety and depression was rated at 50 percent prior to July 29, 2005.,From September 1, 2005 through August 23, 2010, the Veteran's psychiatric disability warranted a 70 percent rating.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected psychiatric disability was partially granted, with an increased rating to 70% effective August 24, 2010. The appeal is mixed as some issues were granted and others denied.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.