Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete development and need for a medical opinion regarding the Veteran's hepatitis C infection.

The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not specifically address the significance of the August 1969 atypical lymphocyte percentage in determining the presence of hepatitis C, nor did they incorporate the 1982 publication from the Office of the Surgeon General and Center of Military History. The Board found this inadequate.

Claimed conditions
hepatitis C
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
April 12, 2010
Citation
1013850

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1013850.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.