The Veteran's appeal for higher initial evaluations for residuals of a right ankle fracture, right ankle scar, and residual numbness of the tip of the right middle finger due to suture has been denied.,The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding service connection for folliculitis.
The deciding factor: The evidence did not meet the criteria for higher initial evaluations for residuals of a right ankle fracture, right ankle scar, and residual numbness of the tip of the right middle finger due to suture at any time relevant to the claim/appeal period.,The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding service connection for folliculitis.
- Claimed conditions
- {"conditionName":"folliculitis"}, service connection for thoracolumbar spine disorder, service connection for cervical spine disorder, service connection for anal fissure, service connection for bilateral knee disorder, service connection for bilateral wrist disorder, {"conditionName":"residuals of a right ankle fracture","issue":["initial evaluation higher than 10 percent for service-connected residuals of a right ankle fracture prior to July 20, 2006","initial evaluation of 20 percent for service-connected residuals of a right ankle fracture from July 20, 2006 onwards"]}, {"conditionName":"right ankle scar","issue":["approximation of one initial compensable evaluation for service-connected right ankle scars prior to April 2, 2004 and from July 20, 2006 to April 23, 2009","separate 10 percent evaluation for the second right ankle scar from April 24, 2009"]}, {"conditionName":"residual numbness of the tip of the right middle finger due to a wound suture","issue":["initial compensable evaluation for residual numbness of the tip of the right middle finger due to a wound suture at any time relevant to the claim/appeal period"]}
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 27, 2010
- Citation
- 1015354
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1015354.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issue of entitlement to service connection for a back disability due to a duty to assist error, specifically regarding VA's failure to provide the Veteran with a VA examination prior to the rating decision.
- Granted
The Board granted a 50 percent rating for the Veteran's migraine headaches based on prostrating attacks occurring more than once a month and severe economic inadaptability.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for special monthly compensation based on loss of use of his left foot, as there was no evidence showing that the service-connected conditions resulted in functional limitation equal to that of amputation of the left foot with prosthesis.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.