The Veteran's service-connected bilateral dermatophytosis of the feet and occasional candidiasis in the corner of the mouth are currently evaluated as 10 percent disabling. The Board finds that these conditions do not warrant a higher rating based on current evidence.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence does not show disfigurement, limitation of function of an affected part, or skin symptoms affecting at least 20 percent to 40 percent of the entire body or exposed areas affected. The Veteran's service-connected conditions are currently evaluated as 10 percent disabling and do not warrant a higher rating.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral dermatophytosis of the feet, candidiasis in the corner of the mouth
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- May 11, 2010
- Citation
- 1017435
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1017435.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran is granted special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for aid and attendance of another person due to his service-connected schizoaffective disorder with explosive disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a VA examination to assess the Veteran's employability and consideration of whether an extraschedular evaluation is appropriate.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected skin disorder, bilateral dermatophytosis of the feet and occasional candidiasis in the corner of the mouth, is being remanded due to incomplete records and the need for a VA examination.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.