The Veteran's initial and subsequent right ankle disability ratings have been denied as the evidence does not support a finding of 'marked' limitation of motion or other criteria warranting an increased rating.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence shows that prior to April 20, 2006, the Veteran had limited range of motion but did not meet the criteria for a 'marked' limitation of motion as defined by VA regulations. The subsequent ratings were based on ongoing symptoms and limitations without additional findings supporting higher evaluations.
- Claimed conditions
- Post-operative right ankle instability, Arthritic changes, Posttraumatic deformity of the talus, Anterior talofibular ligament tear, Fibular and tibial avulsion fractures
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- May 18, 2010
- Citation
- 1018497
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1018497.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted a 20 percent rating for the right knee disability effective June 1, 1997. The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date remains pending.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected right knee disorder, finding that there was no basis to assign a higher schedular evaluation based on arthritis and limitation of motion.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.